Most of us have either the eternalist or annihilationist views about self. We think of us as permanent even though we know that The Buddha taught us that there is anatta. Learning from this Sutta, Sayadaw said that if we think that we are the same person, for example, we think that if we perform dana now and later we will be born in heavenly realm; the 'we' is the same person then we have the eternalist wrong view. On the other hand, if we then think that the 'we' is different, then we have the annihilationist wrong views. Actually there is no 'we'.
Oh! Oh! Here goes the understanding in most of us. But then, in satipatthana meditation we had always been advised to watch the five aggregates namely nama (made out of 4 aggregates) and rupa (1 aggregate).
In a moment, the combination of the five aggregates is unique but then will changed in the next moment. So we cannot said that there is no person in that moment in the conventional truth as there are the five aggregates coming together, but in the next moment that the person that exist is not of the same aggregrates. Confusing isn't it.
The importance of Pattica Samuppada is also shown in this Sutta. Sayadaw said that every Buddha will have to contemplate on the Dependent Origination before becoming Enlightened. Reflecting on the Dependent Origination, The Buddha knows and understands suffering, it's cause, it's cessation and how to cause its cessation.
Mind our views - that's the gist of tonight talk.
Sadhu, sadhu, sadhu.
http://hk.geocities.com/dhammachanda_1/vb/p79e.gif
http://www.wakarusa.com/images/artists_musiclineup/Nama-Rupa.jpg
http://www.wakarusa.com/images/artists_musiclineup/Nama-Rupa.jpg